No. Investment capital should be kept separate from project or administrative fees, government filing fees, legal and preparation costs, and later immigration-stage costs, and current fee schedules and agreements should be confirmed directly.
Ask what each payment is actually for
Confirm whether a fee is refundable and what happens if the project or the immigration case changes. Keep independent financial diligence and family-related expenses visible in the budget, since an advertised package price can omit material commitments and a quoted return does not describe the full financial exposure.
Make a ledger that separates qualifying capital from administrative fees, professional charges, travel, translations, project fees, and reserves. For every fee, record who receives it, whether it is refundable, and whether it forms part of the capital analysis. Hypothetical example: a sustainable-packaging investor treats a regional-center administrative charge as though it purchased a job-creation interest. The governing documents should be read to determine what the payment actually buys and what remains exposed to business risk. EB-5 requires qualifying capital placed at risk and evidence of the required jobs; conditional residence is not the same as final removal of conditions.
A documented payment purpose avoids confusing an expense with capital that remains exposed to loss.